Wednesday, August 3, 2016

CMO Turnover Has Spiked: Here's Why



More CMO's were on the move in the first half of 2016 then in any time since 2012 and most companies are looking outside their walls for this key hire. This is according to executive search firm Russell Reynolds and noted first by Forbes.
Of particular interest, 62% of the hires were from outside the company. In tech, the number was a stunning 86%. So why the sudden jump and why are companies recruiting outsiders?
1) Fresh Strategic Thinking The Digital Marketing Tsunami is taking no prisoners as channels expand, and connecting with your customer is becoming more challenging. Organizations are looking for the best and brightest with a track record of achievement in the digital space.
2) New Skillset  MarTech, forecasting, vision, data analysis, personalized messaging, digital value proposition, revenue generation, building the right team..should I keep going? Most important skill: Instinct. When to call an audible.
3) More Is Expected and Less Are Achieving Let's face it, the CMO is the most pivotal position on the Executive Team today. With the rate of change in marketing at an all time high, there isn't time to waste. CMO's must quickly come up to speed and create a plan. Then they need to put their chips down and get moving.
4) Other Brand Are Further Along Digitally Why pick an outsider? The new playing field is being dominated by a new group of organizations that have figured it out. They get Instagram, Snapchat and the messaging platforms, and they are pumping resources into customer experience. They've hired the best data scientists and are calling the right plays for their team.
Let me know what you think. Why else do you believe CMO's on the move? Who is doing it right?

The Fall Of The American Textile Industry And The Bitter Fight For Survival

The phone rang. Our largest customer was on the line to tell me goodbye and that our multi year business relationship was over. As I hung up the receiver, I knew that an era just came to an end. A 20 year career in the US Textile industry was likely over. The mill I represented was foundering like so many others and about to file Chapter 11, a risk my clients could not take. This was Summer, 2005. The industry actually began to unravel 10 years earlier, when businesses suddenly began fighting over a dramatically smaller piece of pie.

It wasn't long after that phone call, that I was packing up my desk and walking out of my office for the last time. In fact, it turned out to be the end of my long run in the industry. I had been working on my next act for several years though, so by the Fall of 2005 I had started with a digital marketing agency in a complete career reset. But that's a story for another day. Today I want to focus on that 10 year battle as the industry contracted, what it taught me, how I navigated, the skills that remain with me and its relevance in today's digital economy.

History


First Hit: Hello, Sam Walton- In many ways the textile industry was one of the first industries to be disrupted. For many decades, the textile mills sold their wares to manufacturers of apparel that had facilities in the US and who in turn sold finished garments to some of the large department stores such as Sears, JCPenney, Macy's and Dillards. But by the mid '80's into the 90's, the explosive growth of the Discounters, Walmart and K Mart was creating massive shock waves in the marketplace, and these players increasingly gained market share at the expense of the department stores. In order to effectively compete and meet the low prices that the Discounters demanded, the apparel manufacturers began looking for ways to dramatically cut costs. Many shut their facilities in the US and began manufacturing in Asia. This delivered a chain reaction up the distribution network. Many of our customers were now packing up for the likes of China, Vietnam, India and other low cost countries. Buying US fabric and sewing garments here did not really make sense anymore both logistically and cost wise as many of the foreign producers were offering 'packages' which included the fabric price. This was a major business model shift and guess what, it caught most of the major players flat footed. US mills saw margins and market share begin to erode.





 


Second Hit: Government Kiss-Off 
In 2001, China was admitted to the WTO and for the first time would be eligible to have its apparel exports removed from quota. In 2002, China's exports to the United States surged by more than 100 percent. Chinese exports of baby clothes surged by more than 2,000 percent, robes by more than 1,500 percent, and knit fabrics by 21,000 percent! Overall, China increased its U.S. import market share of the apparel released from quota from 24 to 86 percent. The US Government decided to focus on the nascent, but much more promising technology industry and in the process pulled the plug on millions of jobs in the US.  The kill shot was the agreement to remove all quotas on Chinese imports beginning in  2005.


Becoming A "Wartime General"

So how do you shift from marketing and selling to customers who have been decades loyal, paid your price, and knew your families to a dramatically new playing field where all bets were off? The answer is: not well at first. Selling was pretty easy up until then, but it was now becoming a battle for survival. Our customers were scrambling, busily pursuing JV's with foreign providers, closing US facilities, and re setting priorities.
In 1994, as a senior exec of a large mill, I became part of a MBO of my division and we spun off into a stand alone company. Not the greatest time to go it alone as it turned out. The particular type of fabric we produced, called greige(undyed) goods was the first area to become commoditized. I reorganized my group in New York, but before we knew what hit us, we were on the ropes, and forced to file Chapter 7 in 1996. The business just vanished and we scrambled to compete.
The experience was painful but enlightening. I got a taste of the new business climate and learned that you can't stand still when the competitive environment is throwing hay makers.  In my next role, I created a battle plan which moved away from the traditional x's and o's and instead became a blueprint for survival. A fresh strategic approach was required and time was short. I focused on stopping the bleeding first, applying rigid cost cuts, then shifting focus on higher margin products which leveraged product innovation and lastly, began making the case against the enemy. As it turned out, the delivery times from Asia were long and commitments were not being met. Our salespeople needed to be armed with this messaging. I used this plan in my next 3 positions and in each case, was able to stabilize the situation, restore profitability and keep the doors open. Here is the essence of the plan:
Game Plan for Survival
Fight! As a business leader, it was up to me to deliver the mindset required for success. It was no longer just about meeting sales goals, but more about keeping our jobs and providing for our families. It was now personal. We were engaged in a bitter global battle for survival and we needed to come to the office every day ready to fight and win. This mindset was critical to making it work.

Cut Costs I had to make tough decisions on headcount and expenses, and it was dictated by our focus and best chance of survival. We asked more from dramatically fewer people. With the market shrinking, we needed to adjust to become leaner and compete.

Product Shift We de-emphasized products that were under the heaviest attack and shifted attention to those that were innovative and provided the greatest value to the consumer.

Revise Pricing Strategy In addition to our higher margin, innovative fabrics, we took a few orders on basic staples at little or no margin to keep the mills running. In the past, we would reject these orders but now understood their importance.

Sell Value Textile Magnate Roger Milliken started a movement in the 1980's called Crafted With Pride In the USA aimed at educating the consumer on the importance of buying American. He was a pioneer and a futurist and seeing danger in the offing, he took the industry's case to the people. In our sales conversations, we needed to paint the picture of the perils of buying from foreign suppliers, so we began to calculate the cost of late deliveries and poor quality(another achilles heel of some of the foreign providers). In today's new digital world, and some 30 years later, demonstrating value remains critical to success.

Conclusion:

The period from 1994-2005 represented one of the biggest challenges in my career. The experience was at times devastating, unsettling, confusing and frightening. But it taught me how to become a leader, how to dig deep, how to recover from setbacks, how to face your fears, how to constantly anticipate change, and how to reinvent yourself, your team and your company.
In 2016, there are elements of the 1990's textile industry beginning to re-appear. Business leaders need to think through what their future looks like in the digital world and begin taking action ahead of potentially cataclysmic disruption. The good news is that there are many examples of companies that have made the transition and re invented themselves, among them IBM, Nokia, Nintendo, American Express and probably the most notable of them all, Apple. So, keep an eye open for what is coming on the horizon. Better yet, lead the way and create the future! Good Luck!

Disrupted or Transformed: The New Reality


The new digital world, while a land of promise and opportunity, can be difficult to navigate as it matures and as your audience becomes more demanding and discerning. Yet most organizations continue to embrace the status quo. Why is that? More importantly, what can be done to remedy this problem? Many companies are coming to a fork in the road. Choose the right direction and you will digitally transform into a industry leader that is thriving in the new world. But if you choose the wrong path, you run the risk of becoming another victim of digital disruption. That's what we will discuss today.

What's Wrong?

Low Digital Quotient: McKinsey has coined a new phrase to describe organizational maturity in the digital world. Companies have a digital quotient(DQ) and many of them need improvement says McKinsey. Digital performance today is critical to an organization's viability and a key determiner of success in the future. The sophistication of your digital strategy and the execution of your digital initiatives according to McKinsey is what separates the leaders from the laggards in 2016. The laggards are headed for disruption while the leaders are paving their way to Digital Transformation.

Stuck in Current Business Model: Will you be the next Blockbuster or Uber? Is the current way you go to market and make money sustainable? According to McKinsey, it is a 'broader range of customer needs" that organizations need to constantly monitor and address. This may require a pivot in the current business model. It's a tightrope walk between the status quo and possible disruption or transformation. Keep your eye on creating value for your customers and adjust as needed. It may require a tweak to your current approach. By contrast, it may require a rip and replace.

Changing Competitive Set: Likewise, the path which leads you to transformation may bring you into competition with new players. The new business model needs to account for current and future threats in the form of the competitive landscape.

Insufficient Organizational Alignment: The digital laggards today are not aligned internally and do not have executive buy in. In many cases, the organizational culture is the key factor behind the success or failure to be aligned. Is the culture open and fluid? Or is it stuck in the "didn't we used to have it all?" past.


Playbook for Change:

So how should companies navigate their way to transformation and not fall victim to disruption?
Redefine How You Serve Your Customers: A recent IBM study revealed that 75% of consumers expect businesses to understand their individual needs. Data is now your main source of leverage in the fight for survival and excellence in driving new levels of positive customer experience. The effective leveraging of data is critical to a marketing organization's ability to create omni-channel experiences for these more demanding consumers and business buyers. And according to Gartner, 69% of marketing decisions will be quantitatively driven by 2017.  Marketers are being called upon to not only ring the cash register, but also to analyze data and attribute value for their efforts. According to Gartner,  "using data to inform creativity to generate demand, converting demand to sale, and measuring and attributing value across channels and media" is the new virtuous circle of success.

  "Data Is The New Oil"-Kevin Plank, UnderArmour
Conquer complexity: 84% of marketers in a recent Salesforce.com study believe that thelevel of complexity in their business is going to spike over the next 5 years. (see the HuffPo article, High Performing CMO's...)
This complexity will likely take the form of adopting "new business models, ecosystems, and collaboration processes that cut out unnecessary layers and re- imagine how work can get done for better, faster, more cost-effective results."
The digital leaders will be skilled at predicting technological trends, and thinking on their feet. Companies in the new digital world need to plan for the long term but also be ready to make fast decisions as new channels, stakeholders and technologies rapidly appear. Change, my friends, is constant so expectations need to be adjusted accordingly.

Push for Executive Buy In(and more budget, too!): 83% of high performing marketers report having “their executive team’s complete commitment to their marketing strategy.”(Salesforce) Therefore, the marketing leader also needs to be a master salesperson. Yes, you got it right, salesperson. Not only does the marketing leader need to know how to sell the company's products and services, he/she needs to be able to effectively make the case for more resources and if necessary, major realignment. She needs to sell the BOD, and the rest of the senior team to commit the funds to fuel the required changes.

Innovation spending: Not many experts are pointing to this key ingredient in winning the battle for your digital future. Gartner recently found that companies spend on average 10% of their marketing budgets on innovation. This figure needs to be shifted upward and dramatically. A new digital value proposition is going to require more experimentation and creation of new technologies and solutions.


Win the War For Talent: And finally, but certainly not the least important is recruiting and building the team. Gartner says you must recruit in accordance with your level of digital maturity. Makes sense. Do you need a change agent to come in and crack some eggs? And where are these art+science marketers? Are new compensation plans required? Your ability to recruit the right players to help drive your digital competence is another key.


Phew, that was a lot to digest, but it is just the beginning. I am interested in what you are seeing in your organization. Let me know. Do you think your company is making the right moves? Good luck!